Another sad loss for the analog-design community, and the engineering world as a whole: Bob Pease, analog circuit-design expert, was killed in a car crash Saturday (June 18), after leaving a private service for Jim Williams, who passed away a week before (see here and here).
My colleague, Paul Rako of EDN, said:
Bob understood how they were made, how they changed, how they worked, what we wanted them to do, and how these circuits had their own quirks and idiosyncrasies. He was an expert at seeing how tolerances, tempcos, and drifts would actually affect immediate and long-term performance, and how secondary and even tertiary device parameters would come into play in a circuit.
His columns, which often took the form of a basic "blackboard sketch" of a schematic, would analyze the underlying sources of circuit misbehavior and critique the often unrecognized, unintended consequences of subtle elements. He detested Spice simulations as confusing precision with insight, and preferred to roughly estimate performance and results via deep understanding rather than exactly analyze with a flawed model.
His "reader questions" columns were also wonders of insight into how to approach problems, judging what solutions were feasible and practical, and admitting that sometimes a solution to the reader's problem was bigger than the problem itself--and would actually introduce new problems. He also understand the our components are not ideal, vendors make internal changes to their IC die, materials, and test processes, and the buildup of these variations and changes could easily make a good circuit design, whether on paper or prototype, go bad in reality.
Bob's passing leaves the analog and engineering community with one fewer large, looming figure who knew so much, and who we could all continue to learn from. He will be sorely missed. •
My colleague, Paul Rako of EDN, said:
"I was a good friend of Bob's. I worked with him for 5 years, and saw him at conferences for a decade before that. We went to lunch and often saw each other at functions.And the San Jose Mercury News reported,
He was working at National Saturday. He showed up late at the Mountain Winery, where Jim Williams' wife was having a small memorial service for that deceased analog great. I saw Bob about 4:30 and the function had ended at 4:00. I was driving out of the parking lot and waved to him, telling him the event was over.
It was on the way down the hill that his car left the road and he hit a tree. His wife fears he may have had a stroke or heart attack."
"An elderly San Francisco man was killed after his car hit a tree in Saratoga on Saturday evening, according to the California Highway Patrol.Many of you know Bob, who had been with National Semiconductor Corp. for many years, from his regular columns in Electronic Design. He wrote about hiking in the Himalayas, his trusty Volkswagen Beetle, and many other odd topics, but most of all, he wrote about analog components and circuits.
The 70-year-old man was traveling eastbound in the driveway of 14831 Pierce Road at an unknown speed when he failed to negotiate a curve to the left at about 5:45 p.m., CHP officials said.
The driver's 1969 Volkswagen Beetle veered to the right off of the roadway and crashed into a large tree on the right shoulder, according to the CHP.
After the crash, the Volkswagen came to a stop on its wheels with the front of the car against a tree.
The 70-year-old was not wearing his seatbelt and it appears he was killed instantly, CHP officials said."
Bob understood how they were made, how they changed, how they worked, what we wanted them to do, and how these circuits had their own quirks and idiosyncrasies. He was an expert at seeing how tolerances, tempcos, and drifts would actually affect immediate and long-term performance, and how secondary and even tertiary device parameters would come into play in a circuit.
His columns, which often took the form of a basic "blackboard sketch" of a schematic, would analyze the underlying sources of circuit misbehavior and critique the often unrecognized, unintended consequences of subtle elements. He detested Spice simulations as confusing precision with insight, and preferred to roughly estimate performance and results via deep understanding rather than exactly analyze with a flawed model.
His "reader questions" columns were also wonders of insight into how to approach problems, judging what solutions were feasible and practical, and admitting that sometimes a solution to the reader's problem was bigger than the problem itself--and would actually introduce new problems. He also understand the our components are not ideal, vendors make internal changes to their IC die, materials, and test processes, and the buildup of these variations and changes could easily make a good circuit design, whether on paper or prototype, go bad in reality.
Bob's passing leaves the analog and engineering community with one fewer large, looming figure who knew so much, and who we could all continue to learn from. He will be sorely missed. •
No comments:
Post a Comment